countertransference
Compiled with AI assistance and selectively reviewed. Please consult the cited passages; the books remain the authoritative source. About this companion
Editorial synthesis · provisional
Definition
Countertransference, in RB2’s Bollasian discussion, includes feelings arising in the analyst’s own body within the therapeutic relationship that may serve as clues to embodied communication. The proposed subentry keeps this specific relational use and the task of articulation. It does not treat the analyst’s feeling as direct access to another mind, proof of a past event or an automatically correct interpretation.
Explanation
The source lists posture, emotional atmosphere and the analyst’s bodily feelings as possible ways unarticulated experience becomes perceptible in interaction. Countertransference names the analyst-side feeling in that setting, not every interpersonal emotion or a verified transfer of identical experience from one body into another.
The next paragraph describes helping the unthought known enter thought and language through present embodied interaction. That is an account of the analytic task rather than a standardized technique or evidence that every resulting narrative is historically accurate. The entry keeps the status of a clue open to interpretation and correction.
AB’s broader account of embodied knowing emphasizes that care also makes perception fallible and that concepts can capture attention. Its relational infant account preserves two participants rather than fused minds. These comparisons reinforce the limits of the local use without introducing a treatment recommendation or replacing Bollas’s clinical vocabulary with a new theory.
Scope and attribution
Retain the bounded clinical-theoretical context without claiming diagnostic reliability or a treatment method.
RB2 — The Real Book, Volume II: Becoming Is Being
The analyst’s bodily feeling is a relational clue within Bollas’s task of articulation.
Occurrence locators: 88.
Background used in the editorial explanation
Analyst-side countertransference is distinguished from patient-side felt tendencies and general fallible knowing.