homology
Compiled with AI assistance and selectively reviewed. Please consult the cited passages; the books remain the authoritative source. About this companion
Editorial synthesis · provisional
Definition
Homology names a shared underlying generative structure rather than surface resemblance or shared purpose. The biological example relates differently functioning limbs through a common inherited plan. In the books' extended use, it compares Simondon's individuation and Kastner's quantum actualization as relational resolutions of real potential, without identifying their substances, mechanisms, domains or ancestry, or treating their convergence as independent proof.
Explanation
AB introduces the human arm, bat's wing and whale's flipper before explicitly loosening the biological sense into structural correspondence. The preindividual field and quantum substratum occupy analogous positions in their respective accounts, but their semantics and evidential responsibilities differ. AB acknowledges that the author's preference for Kastner partly selected the convergence; PB makes that vulnerability personal, calling the persuasive rhyme a trap rather than evidence and inviting readers to check the developed argument.
RB1 gives the extension a precise ontogenetic formulation: a real, metastable field becomes determinate through selective, relational and irreversible operation. Its native note excludes common ancestry from this extended use. The comparison concerns the whole constrained situation, not a simple lottery or a mapping of offer to potential and confirmation to constraint. Actualization changes further possibilities; excluded outcomes do not all remain available. RB1 also preserves differences between trans-domain philosophical concepts and quantum formalism, and between ordinary temporal development and pre-spatiotemporal transaction structure.
Scope and attribution
Biological illustration and extended ontogenetic correspondence are separate senses. Direct ownership is AB and RB1 for the illustration, and AB, PB and RB1 for the extension. RB3's related resonance is contextual comparison, not a new lexical treatment; RB2 supplies no direct homology witness in this bounded review.
AB — The Actual Book
AB moves from inherited skeletal architecture to a looser structural correspondence between the preindividual and quantum substratum, while denying theoretical identity and independent evidential convergence.
Occurrence locators: 30, 34, 36, 37; Notes: 238.
PB — The Possible Book
PB records the author's attraction to Kastner's resemblance to Simondon, identifies confirmation bias as a risk, and directs the reader to test the argument rather than trust that attraction.
Occurrence locators: 57.
RB1 — The Real Book, Volume I: The Possible Is Real
RB1 defines ontogenetic correspondence through real potential, relational resolution and determinate actuality. Its biological illustration does not transfer common ancestry into the extension, and its pluralistic qualification preserves domain-specific dynamics and constraints.
Occurrence locators: 61, 102, 104, 105, 108, 111, 113, 114, 115, 116, 117, 118, 119, 148; Notes: 105.
Background used in the editorial explanation
Domain-specific mechanisms and wider analogies remain distinguished. Original definitions retain their scope; local cross-references do not rewrite them. Named theories and mechanisms are distinguished from neighboring background, homonyms and the author’s own synthesis. Reproduced AI passages retain their separate voice.